What Participation Actually Looks Like — And What It Doesn’t

A major barrier to manufacturer involvement is intimidation. Many companies assume participation requires a compliance department, legal counsel, and unlimited time. That assumption keeps manufacturers silent—and silence creates vulnerability.

Participation can be practical and scalable.

Here are examples of what participation actually looks like:

  • Joining an industry trade group or alliance to stay informed and contribute to standards

  • Volunteering input on safety guidance that reflects real manufacturing conditions

  • Supporting independent research that improves product understanding

  • Participating in shared adverse event models so surveillance is consistent

  • Contributing to collective lab testing initiatives where appropriate

  • Engaging in regulatory roundtables to improve accuracy and feasibility

  • Publishing public safety transparency statements that support trust without exposing proprietary formulas

Just as important: participation is not about surrendering control.

Participation does not mean:

  • exposing proprietary formulas publicly

  • accepting unrealistic standards without objection

  • letting outside parties define your manufacturing practices

  • turning small manufacturers into compliance casualties

Done correctly, participation is the opposite. It is a mechanism for protecting responsible manufacturers by ensuring oversight is realistic, science-based, and operationally achievable.

TIMA’s mission is to make participation achievable—especially for small and mid-sized companies—by providing frameworks, resources, and collective guidance that reduce the burden of navigating this environment alone.

Previous
Previous

What Manufacturers Must Do Now — A Practical Call to Action

Next
Next

When Things Go Wrong — Three Scenarios That Can Break a Brand